“Poor Things” by Yorgos Lanthimos has visual and thematic elements that are beautifully and wildly creative. The term "kaleidoscope of images" metaphorically encapsulates the film's rich and multifaceted visual storytelling. Throughout the narrative, viewers are treated to a vivid array of scenes that span the spectrum from whimsical to poignant. There is so much to look at in every scene it is quite dizzying! The audience can metaphorically encapsulate the film's rich and multifaceted visual storytelling, and throughout the narrative, we are treated to a vivid array of scenes that span the spectrum from whimsical to poignant.
Emma Stone won the Best Actress Oscar for this movie. Her portrayal of Bella Baxter, the central character navigating a Victorian-era landscape, serves as the focal point of this visual journey. The film employs a blend of gothic aesthetics and satirical elements, creating a tapestry of emotions and experiences that shift like the patterns in a kaleidoscope. Each scene is crafted with meticulous attention to detail, from the sepia-toned panoramas of the era to the chiaroscuro lighting that enhances the dramatic tension.
The screenplay is based on a novel by Alasdair Gray, presenting an intriguing twist on the classic Frankenstein tale of a mad scientist bringing a corpse back to life. In this rendition, the newly formed Bella must navigate a world she is unfamiliar with, driven by her insatiable thirst for adventure and discovery. Her wide-eyed curiosity and constant sense of wonder propel the film, shaping its narrative core. But beyond its adaptation, this film brings a unique perspective worth exploring!
Bella Baxter and Dr. Godwin Baxter
Bella Baxter is a complex and central character in the narrative, whose journey serves as a focal point for exploring themes of identity, agency, and personal growth. Initially introduced as a dutiful daughter and caregiver to her ailing father, Bella's character undergoes a significant transformation throughout the story. One of Bella's defining motivations is her sense of familial duty. At the outset, she is portrayed as someone who sacrifices her own desires and ambitions to fulfill her role as a caregiver for her father, Godwin Baxter. This duty defines much of her early character arc, highlighting her loyalty and sense of responsibility. Bella's initial passivity in her own life underscores a broader theme of societal expectations and the pressures to conform to traditional roles.
As the narrative progresses, Bella's development becomes increasingly marked by her internal struggles and moments of introspection. She begins to question her predetermined path and the constraints imposed by her role as a caregiver. This internal conflict is catalyzed by her interactions with other characters, particularly Archibald McCandless, whose presence challenges Bella to reassess her priorities and aspirations. Eventually, Bella's growth is depicted through subtle shifts in her behavior and decision-making. She gradually asserts her agency and starts to make choices that align more closely with her personal desires rather than solely fulfilling others' expectations. This transformation is symbolic of her journey towards self-discovery and empowerment.
Dr. Godwin Baxter, affectionately referred to by Bella Baxter as "God," embodies a figure of paternal authority and wisdom within the narrative. As Bella's father and a respected physician in their community, Godwin Baxter's character is shaped by his dual roles as a caregiver and a pillar of support. His motivations are deeply rooted in his dedication to his daughter's well-being and the health of his patients, underscoring a sense of responsibility and empathy that defines his actions throughout the story.
One of the primary reasons Bella affectionately calls him "God" stems from the profound influence he has had on her life. From a young age, Godwin instilled in Bella a sense of moral guidance and nurtured her intellectual curiosity. His role as both a parent and a mentor is characterized by unconditional love and a steadfast commitment to fostering Bella's growth, both personally and professionally. Furthermore, Godwin Baxter's characterization as "God" reflects Bella's reverence and admiration for his capabilities and wisdom. As a renowned physician, he possesses knowledge and experience that command respect within their community. His ability to heal and comfort others, coupled with his compassionate demeanor, earns him the admiration not only of Bella but also of those around him.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Reference
In Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein," the themes of identity and self-creation are profoundly explored through the character of Victor Frankenstein and his creation. Victor, driven by his desire to push the boundaries of scientific knowledge, ultimately creates a being that grapple with its own identity and purpose in the world. The Creature, abandoned by its creator and rejected by society, embarks on a journey of self-discovery, seeking acceptance and understanding amidst its monstrous appearance. This theme underscores the novel's exploration of what defines humanity and the consequences of playing God through scientific experimentation. Moreover, Shelley critiques the role of science and technology in society, cautioning against the unchecked pursuit of knowledge without ethical consideration. Victor's obsession with his experiments leads to tragic outcomes, highlighting the dangers of scientific ambition divorced from moral responsibility.
In contrast, "Poor Things” offers a contemporary reinterpretation of these themes within a satirical framework. The movie explores identity and self-creation through the character of Bella Baxter, a woman resurrected from the dead by a mad scientist. Similar to Frankenstein's Creature, Bella navigates a world where her identity is shaped and manipulated by others, challenging conventional notions of agency and autonomy. Lanthimos examines the intersection of science and society, portraying the absurdity and consequences of scientific meddling in human affairs. Gender roles and power dynamics are also central, as Bella's reanimation disrupts traditional patriarchal structures, prompting reflection on the ethical implications of controlling life and death. Both works provoke critical reflection on the boundaries of scientific inquiry and the ethical responsibilities that accompany such advancements, resonating through their respective explorations of identity, power, and the human condition.
Dystopian Visions: Science, Society, and Humanity in Film
If we compare "Poor Things" and "Metropolis" (1927), they are both significant films that delve into themes of science, society, and the human condition, albeit in vastly different cinematic styles and contexts. Fritz Lang's "Metropolis" is a seminal work of German Expressionism and science fiction, set in a dystopian future where class divisions are starkly portrayed through the stark contrast between the wealthy elite who live in luxurious skyscrapers and the oppressed workers toiling underground. The film explores themes of industrialization, social inequality, and the dehumanizing effects of technology and mechanization. The cityscape itself is a character, reflecting the power dynamics and social tensions within the narrative.
However, "Poor Things" offers a more contemporary and satirical take on similar themes. While "Metropolis" critiques the industrial age and the rise of mechanization, "Poor Things" satirizes scientific ambition and gender dynamics in a surreal, absurdist manner. Lanthimos uses dark humor and absurd situations to explore themes of identity, power, and the ethics of scientific experimentation. Bella Baxter's resurrection and subsequent manipulation by the mad scientist Dr. Godwin Baxter parallel the themes of creation and control present in "Metropolis," but through a more personal and intimate lens. In other words, where "Metropolis" focuses on the grandeur and spectacle of its dystopian world, "Poor Things" emphasizes the peculiarities and dark humor of its characters' interactions and moral dilemmas.
Historical Context
The film situates itself within a historical context that both embraces and subverts Victorian literature and the Gothic tradition. Set in a fictionalized Victorian Scotland, the film navigates themes of scientific experimentation, societal norms, and the supernatural, much like its literary predecessors. Lanthimos pays homage to Victorian aesthetics through meticulous period details and a stylized visual presentation that evokes the era's atmosphere of mystery and intrigue.
However, what sets "Poor Things" apart is Lanthimos' subversive treatment of these traditions. Rather than a straightforward adaptation, the film employs dark humor and surrealism to critique Victorian mores and expectations. The narrative revolves around Bella Baxter, brought back to life by the unorthodox methods of Dr. Godwin Baxter, a character who echoes the mad scientist archetype of Gothic fiction. This resurrection and Bella's subsequent interactions challenge conventional notions of identity and agency, reflecting Lanthimos' penchant for exploring existential themes through absurd and thought-provoking scenarios.
Thematically, "Poor Things" delves into the Gothic tradition's fascination with the macabre and the uncanny, exploring themes of power dynamics, control, and the ethical implications of scientific intervention. By juxtaposing Victorian propriety with Lanthimos' signature offbeat humor and narrative twists, the film not only honors its literary influences but also invites audiences to reconsider the timeless themes of autonomy and the human condition in a uniquely contemporary context.
Reconstructing Gender
Bella's transformation serves as a poignant exploration of gender and power dynamics, deeply rooted in feminist interpretations. Initially portrayed as a passive and marginalized figure, Bella undergoes a radical metamorphosis orchestrated by Dr. Godwin Baxter, challenging conventional notions of female autonomy and agency. Her resurrection and subsequent empowerment can be seen as a critique of patriarchal structures that confine women to submissive roles. Bella's newfound strength and assertiveness symbolize a reclaiming of power over her own narrative, echoing feminist ideals of self-determination and resistance against oppressive forces.
Through Bella's journey, the film interrogates societal norms and expectations placed upon women, particularly in Victorian-era contexts where gender roles were rigidly defined. Her transformation from a seemingly helpless victim to a woman who orchestrates her own fate underscores the complexities of power dynamics within relationships and the broader socio-political landscape. By subverting traditional gender roles and challenging the authority of male characters like Dr. Baxter, "Poor Things" not only critiques patriarchal structures but also highlights the resilience and agency of women in navigating and shaping their own destinies. Ultimately, the movie offers a nuanced exploration of gender and power, inviting viewers to reconsider narratives of victimhood and empowerment through a feminist lens.
Humor and Satire
Its humor and satire intertwine to dissect Victorian society with sharp wit and keen observation. The movie utilizes humor not merely for amusement but as a potent tool to expose and critique the hypocrisies deeply ingrained in the era's societal norms. Through comedic elements, the film lays bare the contradictions and absurdities present in Victorian values, such as rigid class distinctions, gender roles, and moral codes. By exaggerating and ridiculing these conventions, humor in "Poor Things" acts as a mirror, reflecting back the contradictions and irrationalities that underpin Victorian society. Characters and situations are often presented in a manner that invites laughter, yet beneath the surface lies a biting commentary on the oppressive structures that govern their lives. Yet, it is not just making fun of things; it's a way to criticize society. It uses irony and funny characters to point out the hypocrisy in Victorian morals and how people pretend to be proper when they're not. The movie wants people to question why things were the way they were back then and think about how some of those ideas are still around today.
Color Palettes
This film is a visual marvel that intricately weaves its narrative through a distinctive color palette that enhances its darkly comedic and surreal atmosphere. Lanthimos, known for his unique cinematic style, utilizes a muted and desaturated palette dominated by shades of gray, taupe, and slate blue to underscore the film's bleak and unsettling tone. These subdued tones create a sense of unease and detachment, echoing the film's exploration of identity, power dynamics, and societal norms.
Contrasting with the somber tones are occasional bursts of vivid color strategically placed to highlight significant moments or characters. Deep crimson reds appear sporadically, often symbolizing passion, violence, or the visceral aspects of human nature that underpin the narrative's darker themes. The sparing use of these intense colors against the predominantly neutral backdrop serves to accentuate key scenes and emotions, drawing the viewer's attention to pivotal turning points in the story. This deliberate color scheme not only enhances the film's visual storytelling but also reinforces its underlying themes of manipulation, desire, and the blurred lines between reality and illusion.
Visual Imagery
Lanthimos employs vivid and evocative descriptive language related to colors to immerse readers in a world rich with visual imagery. Throughout the narrative, colors are meticulously woven into the descriptions, serving as potent symbols that enhance the atmosphere and deepen the characterization. For instance, Lanthimos describes scenes with a palette dominated by shades of gray and muted blues, creating an aura of melancholy and restraint that mirrors the protagonist's internal struggles. The sparse but deliberate use of vivid colors like crimson and emerald punctuates pivotal moments, amplifying their emotional impact and guiding the reader's interpretation.
The descriptive language related to colors not only paints a vivid picture but also serves as a subtle yet powerful tool for character development. Characters are often associated with specific hues that reflect their personalities or narrative arcs. For example, the protagonist may be described amidst a backdrop of soft lavender, symbolizing her innocence and vulnerability, while a secondary character might be cloaked in deep, brooding shades of indigo, hinting at their complex motives and hidden depths. This nuanced approach to color description enriches the reader's perception of each character's journey and enhances the overall thematic resonance of the story, inviting readers to engage with the narrative on multiple sensory levels.
Symbolism
The film intricately weaves symbolism into its narrative to explore themes of identity, power dynamics, and societal norms. One prominent symbol in the film is the use of masks and disguises, which reflect the characters' efforts to conceal their true selves or manipulate others. This motif underscores the film's exploration of deception and the blurred lines between reality and illusion, inviting viewers to question the authenticity of appearances and motives.
A symbol in "Poor Things" is the use of color, particularly the contrast between muted, desaturated tones and vivid bursts of intense hues. This contrast mirrors the characters' internal conflicts and emotional states, with subdued colors representing repression or constraint, while vibrant colors symbolize passion, violence, or the rawness of human experience. For instance, a character's decision to wear a striking red dress in a somber setting can signify defiance or a desire to stand out amidst conformity. These symbolic uses of color add layers of meaning to the film, enriching its thematic exploration and inviting viewers to decipher the complexities beneath its visually striking surface.
Comments